The contribution deals with the problematic of quality development of research activity in the form of publication output in the index reputable databases. Various evaluation processes and evaluation criteria determine significantly the impact of these results on the evaluation of a faculty as a complex unit. It is important to set up parallel evaluation processes, to eliminate differences in criteria and to continuously create motivation factors to achieve top-level and internationally accredited quality in publication activity. Therefore these results are distinguished for faculty classification into the highest category in the network of universities in the accreditation process of universities in the Slovak Republic. The evaluation process includes on-going evaluation of journal quality (proceedings and others), not only before their indexing in a database, but also during their classification. Research standards are always followed. Contributions and journals indexed in these databases are in the best categories of all types of the faculty evaluation. The same rules are valid also for feedback. Information management of the academic library has a significant proportion on evidence of publication activity and feedback. It is because the evidence of publication activity and feedback are an observed parameter of university activity.
| Published in | Science Journal of Education (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13 |
| Page(s) | 50-57 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Evaluation of Publication Activity, Accreditation and Evaluation, Publication Categories, Journal Indexing, Information Management of Academic Library, Web of Science, Scopus
| [1] | L.C. Amo, S. Ada and R. Sharman, “The Role of Scholar Status in the Academic Publication Process,” International Journal of Doctoral Studies,vol. 7, pp. 79-92, 2012. |
| [2] | Burešová, H. Tomanová, “Journals issued with AV ČR in the World Citation Databases,” Inforum 2013: The 19th Conference on Professional Information Sources, Praha, AlbertinaicomePraha, from http://www.inforum.cz/cs/sbornik, ISSN 1801–2213. |
| [3] | Criteria for assessment of the level of research, developmental, artistic and other creative activities as a part of complex accreditation of activities in higher education institution 2006. |
| [4] | Dean’sRegulationNumber5/2011 from http://www.mtf.stuba.sk/english/students/phd.-study. |
| [5] | Detailed Rules of Evaluation which are followed by Evaluation in concrete Research Areas, 2011, from http://www.akredkom.sk/. |
| [6] | E. Krištofičová, “Evaluation Tools of Library and Research-Information Processes,” Bratislava: CVTI SR, pp. 157, 1997, ISBN 80-85165-62-7. |
| [7] | E. M. Lasda Bergman, “Finding Citations to Social Work Literature: The Relative Benefits of Using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, vol. 38, pp. 370-379, 2012. |
| [8] | NISPEZ, 2011, from http://nispez.cvtisr.sk. |
| [9] | E. Trajtel, P. Kružlík, “Evaluation of Publication Activity at the Slovak Universities,” Ikaros, vol.16, no. 6, 2012. |
| [10] | L. Vavříková, “Trends and Development of Science Publishing,” Inforum 2013: The 19th Conference on Professional Information Sources, Praha, AlbertinaicomePraha, from http://www.inforum.cz/cs/sbornik, ISSN 1801–2213. |
APA Style
Kvetoslava Rešetová. (2014). Quality Development of Publication output in Processes of Faculty Evaluation. Science Journal of Education, 2(2), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13
ACS Style
Kvetoslava Rešetová. Quality Development of Publication output in Processes of Faculty Evaluation. Sci. J. Educ. 2014, 2(2), 50-57. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13,
author = {Kvetoslava Rešetová},
title = {Quality Development of Publication output in Processes of Faculty Evaluation},
journal = {Science Journal of Education},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {50-57},
doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20140202.13},
abstract = {The contribution deals with the problematic of quality development of research activity in the form of publication output in the index reputable databases. Various evaluation processes and evaluation criteria determine significantly the impact of these results on the evaluation of a faculty as a complex unit. It is important to set up parallel evaluation processes, to eliminate differences in criteria and to continuously create motivation factors to achieve top-level and internationally accredited quality in publication activity. Therefore these results are distinguished for faculty classification into the highest category in the network of universities in the accreditation process of universities in the Slovak Republic. The evaluation process includes on-going evaluation of journal quality (proceedings and others), not only before their indexing in a database, but also during their classification. Research standards are always followed. Contributions and journals indexed in these databases are in the best categories of all types of the faculty evaluation. The same rules are valid also for feedback. Information management of the academic library has a significant proportion on evidence of publication activity and feedback. It is because the evidence of publication activity and feedback are an observed parameter of university activity.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Quality Development of Publication output in Processes of Faculty Evaluation AU - Kvetoslava Rešetová Y1 - 2014/04/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13 T2 - Science Journal of Education JF - Science Journal of Education JO - Science Journal of Education SP - 50 EP - 57 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-0897 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20140202.13 AB - The contribution deals with the problematic of quality development of research activity in the form of publication output in the index reputable databases. Various evaluation processes and evaluation criteria determine significantly the impact of these results on the evaluation of a faculty as a complex unit. It is important to set up parallel evaluation processes, to eliminate differences in criteria and to continuously create motivation factors to achieve top-level and internationally accredited quality in publication activity. Therefore these results are distinguished for faculty classification into the highest category in the network of universities in the accreditation process of universities in the Slovak Republic. The evaluation process includes on-going evaluation of journal quality (proceedings and others), not only before their indexing in a database, but also during their classification. Research standards are always followed. Contributions and journals indexed in these databases are in the best categories of all types of the faculty evaluation. The same rules are valid also for feedback. Information management of the academic library has a significant proportion on evidence of publication activity and feedback. It is because the evidence of publication activity and feedback are an observed parameter of university activity. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -
Email: