In X-type bracing structures generally it does not take into account the structural contribution of the compressed member, since it is assumed to have a negligible compressive strength; it considered that the stretched member takes the total stress. In the following we analyse as the stretched diagonal, joined in the middle to the compressed one, improves the structural behaviour of this both with respect to the buckling in-plane or out-of -plane of the structure. First we recall the link between the Euler buckling load of a rod free and braced depending on the stiffness k of the brace. Then we analyse the in-plane and out-of-plane buckling of the rod and, for the two situations, we value the increase of the buckling load due to the elastic brace. In the end for both cases we show in what condition the stretched rod causes that the compressed one buckles in the second mode.
| Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12 |
| Page(s) | 69-72 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Steel Bracing Frame, Buckling of Steel Structure, X-Type Diagonal Bracing
| [1] | Belluzzi O., “Contributo allo studio della stabilità dell’equilibrio di aste compresse”, Ann. dei Lav. Pub., 1929, 12. |
| [2] | G. Winter, “Lateral bracing of columns and beams”, ASCE Trans., 1960, 125. |
| [3] | S. Kitipornchai, D. Finch, “ Stiffness requirements for cross bracings”, J. of Str. Eng., ASCE, 1986, 112 |
| [4] | A. Picard, D. Beaulieu, “ Design of diagonal cross bracing”, Eng. J., AISC, 1987, 24 |
| [5] | T. Galambos, P. Green, T. Helwig, J. Yura, “ Basic design for stability”, AISC-SSRC Short Course, 2003 |
| [6] | Z. Fan, T. Helwig,”Behaviour of steel box girders with top flange brac-ing”, J. of Str. Eng., ASCE, 1999, 125 |
| [7] | AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration, “G13.1 Guidelines for steel girder bridge analysis”, 2011 Washington, D.C. |
| [8] | J. Yura, Widian-to,”Lateral buckling and bracing of beams”, Proceedings of Structural Stability Research Council, Annual Stability Conference, 2005 |
| [9] | T. Helwig, J. Yura,”Steel bridge design handbook: brac-ing system design”, Publication No.FHWA-IF-12-052 – vol. 13, 2012 |
| [10] | NTC2008,“Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni”, D.M.14.01.2008 |
| [11] | IS 800-1993,”Code of Practice for General Construction in Steel”, Bureau of Indian Standard |
APA Style
Gancia Gian Michele. (2014). About Buckling of X-Type Bracing. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 2(4), 69-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12
ACS Style
Gancia Gian Michele. About Buckling of X-Type Bracing. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2014, 2(4), 69-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12
AMA Style
Gancia Gian Michele. About Buckling of X-Type Bracing. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2014;2(4):69-72. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12,
author = {Gancia Gian Michele},
title = {About Buckling of X-Type Bracing},
journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {69-72},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20140204.12},
abstract = {In X-type bracing structures generally it does not take into account the structural contribution of the compressed member, since it is assumed to have a negligible compressive strength; it considered that the stretched member takes the total stress. In the following we analyse as the stretched diagonal, joined in the middle to the compressed one, improves the structural behaviour of this both with respect to the buckling in-plane or out-of -plane of the structure. First we recall the link between the Euler buckling load of a rod free and braced depending on the stiffness k of the brace. Then we analyse the in-plane and out-of-plane buckling of the rod and, for the two situations, we value the increase of the buckling load due to the elastic brace. In the end for both cases we show in what condition the stretched rod causes that the compressed one buckles in the second mode.},
year = {2014}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - About Buckling of X-Type Bracing AU - Gancia Gian Michele Y1 - 2014/06/20 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 69 EP - 72 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20140204.12 AB - In X-type bracing structures generally it does not take into account the structural contribution of the compressed member, since it is assumed to have a negligible compressive strength; it considered that the stretched member takes the total stress. In the following we analyse as the stretched diagonal, joined in the middle to the compressed one, improves the structural behaviour of this both with respect to the buckling in-plane or out-of -plane of the structure. First we recall the link between the Euler buckling load of a rod free and braced depending on the stiffness k of the brace. Then we analyse the in-plane and out-of-plane buckling of the rod and, for the two situations, we value the increase of the buckling load due to the elastic brace. In the end for both cases we show in what condition the stretched rod causes that the compressed one buckles in the second mode. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -
Email: