The study was conducted at Mechara Agricultural Research Centre during 2016–2018 to evaluate nutrient content of vermicompost made from different substrates. The treatments were sorghum straw, maize straw, teff straw, haricot bean straw, grass straw and mixture of all straws. A red worm (Eisenia fetida) was selected to digest the substrates. The substrates was chopped and added to the worm bin volume calculated using spherical frustum formula 1/6πh (3a2+3b2+h2 in a ration 2.5:1 ration of cattle manure to crop residue in weight basis. Water was sprayed to maintain optimum moisture for worms as it needed. The vermi composting process was started by releasing 100 worms in to the substrates. Matured composite vermicompost samples were prepared and collected for laboratory analysis. The laboratory result showed that, the pH and EC values of all type of vermicompost are found in suitable range for survival of earthworms and also for plant growth. Data with regards to %OC, C: N ratio and CEC of vermicompost made from all material is excellent and promise for improvement of soil properties. Relatively the highest (4.26%) and lowest (3.04%) TN content was recorded from vermicompost made from grasses and haricot bean substrates respectively. The highest value of available P and K was also registered from vermicompost prepared from all materials. Even if the values of recorded exchangeable Ca, Mg, K and extractable micro nutrients were different, the vermicompost obtained from all substrates were rich in exchangeable cations and micro nutrients. Therefore, the nutrient content of vermicompost prepared from all substrates showed the highest values for all macro and micro plant nutrients. Thus, the vermicompost made from all materials could correct the plant nutrient imbalance and could be used for vermicompost preparation based on the accessibility of materials. Also utilizing the vermicompost for crop production and enhancing soil fertility.
| Published in | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12 |
| Page(s) | 125-130 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nutrient, Soil Fertility, Straw, Substrates, Vermicompost
| [1] | Abdissa Bekele, Kibebew Kibret, Bobe Bedadi, Markku Yli-Halla, Tesfaye Balemi. 2018. Effects of Lime, Vermicompost, and Chemical P Fertilizer on Selected Properties of Acid Soils of Ebantu District, Western Highlands of Ethiopia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8178305. |
| [2] | Adhikary S. 2012. Vermicompost, the story of organic gold: A review, Agricultural Sciences, 3 (7), 905–917. |
| [3] | Alemayehu Biri, Sheleme Kaba, Fikadu Taddesse, Nigussie Dechassa, Sharma JJ, Asrat Zewidi and Arvind Chavhan. 2016. Effect of Vermicompost and Nitrogen Application on Striga Incidence, Growth, and Yield of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Monech] in Fedis, eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Life Sciences, 4 (3): 349-360. |
| [4] | Amir Khan and Fouzia Ishaq, 2011. Chemical nutrient analysis of different composts (VermicompostandPitcompost) and their effect on the growth of a vegetative crop Pisumsativum. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, 1 (1): 116-130. |
| [5] | Brady, N. and R. Weil. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th Edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 960 p. |
| [6] | Coulibaly S. S and Zoro Bi. I. A. 2010. Influence of animal wastes on growth and reproduction of the African earthworm species Eudriluseugeniae (Oligochaeta). European Journal of Soil Biology, 46: 225-229. |
| [7] | Crescent T. 2003. Vermicomposting. Development Alternatives (DA) Sustainable Livelihoods, Retrieved from: (http:// www.dainet.org/livelihoods/default.htm). |
| [8] | Derib Kifle, Gemechu Shumi and Abera Degefa. 2017. Characterization of Vermicompost for Major Plant Nutrient Contents and Manuring Value. Journal of Science and Sustainable Development, 5 (2), 97-108. |
| [9] | Doan TT, Henry-des-Tureaux T, Rumpe C, Janeau JL, Jouquet P. 2015. Impact of compost, vermicompost and biochar on soil fertility, maize yield and soil erosion in Northern Vietnam: a three year mesocosm experiment. Science Total Environment, 514: 147-154. |
| [10] | Edwards CA. 1998. The use of earthworms in the breakdown and management of organic wastes. InC. A. Edwards (ed.) Earthworm Ecology, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 327-354. |
| [11] | Eyasu Mekonnen and Anteneh Argaw, 2015. Bioconversion of Wastes (Khat Leaf Leftovers and Eucalyptus Twigs) into Vermicompost and Assessing Its Impact on Potato Yield. Journal of Agronomy, 14 (1): 37-42. |
| [12] | Gajalakshmi S., Abbasi S. A. 2004. Vermiconversion of paper waste by earthworm born and grown in the waste-fed reactors compared to the pioneers raised to adulthood on cow dung feed, Bioresource Technololgy, (94) 53–56. |
| [13] | Garg P., Gupta A. and Satya S. 2006. Vermicomposting of different types of waste using Eisenia foetida: a comparative study, Bioresource Technololgy, 97: 391–395. |
| [14] | Garg V. K. and Yadav A. 2005. Growth and reproduction of Eisenia foetida in various animal wastes during vermicomposting. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 3 (2005) 51–59. |
| [15] | George, C Dickerson, W. 1994. Chemical characteristics of garden compost and vermicompost. Guide H - 164. |
| [16] | Ghosh, M, Chattopadhyay G. N. and K. Baral. 1999. Transformation of phosphorus during vermicomposting. Bioresource Technology, 69: 149-154. |
| [17] | Glenn, M. 2009. Manual of On-Farm Vermicomposting and Vermiculture, Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada. |
| [18] | Harris, J. W. and Stocker, H. "Spherical Zone (Spherical Layer).1998. Handbook of Mathematics and Computational Science. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 107-108. |
| [19] | Hiranmai, Y. R. and Anteneh Argaw, 2016. Manurial value of khat waste vermicompost from Awday, Harar town, Ethiopia. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste Agriculture, 5: 105–111. |
| [20] | Jouquet E. P, Bloquel E, Thu D. T, Ricoy M, Orange D, Rumpel C and Tran D. T. 2013. Do Compost and Vermicompost Improve Macronutrient Retention and Plant Growth in Degraded Tropical Soils? Compost Science and Utilization, 19: 1, 15-24. |
| [21] | Kalantari S, Hatami S, Ardalan M, Alikhani H. and Shorafa M. 2009. The effect of compost and vermicompost of yard leaf manure on growth of corn. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5 (11), 1317-1323. |
| [22] | Lim SL, Lee LH, Wu TY. 2016. Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. Journal of Clean Production, 111: 262-278. |
| [23] | Mirian R. Alves, Maria D. Landgraf and Maria O. O. Rezende. 2006. Sorption and Desorption of the Herbicide Alachlor on Humic Acid Fractions From Two Vermicomposts. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 36 (6), 797-808. |
| [24] | Molla Hadis, Gashaw Meteke, and Wassie Haile. 2018. Response of bread wheat to integrated application of vermicompost and NPK fertilizers. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13 (1): 14-20. |
| [25] | Nagavallemma K. P., Wani S. P, Stephane L, Padmaja V. V, Vineela C, Babu R. M and Sahrawat K. L. 2004. Vermicomposting: Recycling wastes into valuable organic fertilizer. Global Theme on Agrecosystems Report no. 8. Patancheru 502 324, Andhra Pradesh, India: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 20p. |
| [26] | Najar IA, Khan AB, Hai A. 2015. Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanummelongena) under field conditions. International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste Agriculture, 4: 73-83. |
| [27] | Padmavathiamma, P. K., Li, L. Y., and Kumari, U. R. 2008. An experimental study of vermi-biowaste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresource Technology, 99: 1672-1681. |
| [28] | Rai N, Ashiya P, Rathore DS. 2014. Comparative Study of the Effect of Chemical Fertilizers and Organic Fertilizers on Eisenia foetida. International Journal of Innovation and research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 2 (5): 12991-12998. |
| [29] | Rajiv K. Sinha, Sunita Agarwal, Krunal Chauhan, Vinod Chandran and Brijal Kiranbhai Soni. 2010. Vermiculture Technology: Reviving the Dreams of Sir Charles Darwin for Scientific Use of Earthworms in Sustainable Development Programs. Technology and Investment, 1: 155-172. |
| [30] | Rakkani VM, Vincent S, Kumar, AS, Baskar K. 2018. Organic waste management by earthworm. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science, 3 (1): 13-17. |
| [31] | Santamaria R. S, Ferrera C. R, Almaraz S. J. J, Galvis S. A, Barois B. I. 2001. Dynamics and relationships among microorganisms, C-organic and N-total during composting and vermicomposting. Agrociencia-Montecillo, 5 (4), 377-384. |
| [32] | Saranraj P, Stella D. 2012. Vermicomposting and its importance in improvement of soil nutrients and agricultural crops. Novus Natural Science Research, 1 (1): 14-23. |
| [33] | Sinha RK, Agarwal S, Chauhan K, Valani D. 2010. The wonders of earthworms and its vermicompost in farm production: Charles Darwin’s ‘friends of farmers’, with potential to replace destructive chemical fertilizers from agriculture. Agricultural Science, 1 (2): 76-94. |
| [34] | Suthar S. 2007. Production of vermifertilizer from guar gumindustrial wastes by using composting earthworms Perionyxsansbaricus (Perrier). Environmentalist, 27: 329–335. |
| [35] | Suthar S. 2009. Vermistabilization of municipal sewage sludge amended with sugarcane trash using epigeic Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163: 199–206. |
| [36] | Tolera Abera, Tolcha Tufa, Buzayehu Tola and Haji Kumbi. 2019. Effects of Vermicompost and NPS Fertilizer rate on Yield and Yield Components of Highland Maize in Vertisol Ambo. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 10 (1): 1-15. |
APA Style
Tadele Geremu, Habtamu Hailu, Alemayhu Diriba. (2020). Evaluation of Nutrient Content of Vermicompost Made from Different Substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on Station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 5(4), 125-130. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12
ACS Style
Tadele Geremu; Habtamu Hailu; Alemayhu Diriba. Evaluation of Nutrient Content of Vermicompost Made from Different Substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on Station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ecol. Evol. Biol. 2020, 5(4), 125-130. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12
AMA Style
Tadele Geremu, Habtamu Hailu, Alemayhu Diriba. Evaluation of Nutrient Content of Vermicompost Made from Different Substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on Station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ecol Evol Biol. 2020;5(4):125-130. doi: 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12,
author = {Tadele Geremu and Habtamu Hailu and Alemayhu Diriba},
title = {Evaluation of Nutrient Content of Vermicompost Made from Different Substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on Station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia},
journal = {Ecology and Evolutionary Biology},
volume = {5},
number = {4},
pages = {125-130},
doi = {10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eeb.20200504.12},
abstract = {The study was conducted at Mechara Agricultural Research Centre during 2016–2018 to evaluate nutrient content of vermicompost made from different substrates. The treatments were sorghum straw, maize straw, teff straw, haricot bean straw, grass straw and mixture of all straws. A red worm (Eisenia fetida) was selected to digest the substrates. The substrates was chopped and added to the worm bin volume calculated using spherical frustum formula 1/6πh (3a2+3b2+h2 in a ration 2.5:1 ration of cattle manure to crop residue in weight basis. Water was sprayed to maintain optimum moisture for worms as it needed. The vermi composting process was started by releasing 100 worms in to the substrates. Matured composite vermicompost samples were prepared and collected for laboratory analysis. The laboratory result showed that, the pH and EC values of all type of vermicompost are found in suitable range for survival of earthworms and also for plant growth. Data with regards to %OC, C: N ratio and CEC of vermicompost made from all material is excellent and promise for improvement of soil properties. Relatively the highest (4.26%) and lowest (3.04%) TN content was recorded from vermicompost made from grasses and haricot bean substrates respectively. The highest value of available P and K was also registered from vermicompost prepared from all materials. Even if the values of recorded exchangeable Ca, Mg, K and extractable micro nutrients were different, the vermicompost obtained from all substrates were rich in exchangeable cations and micro nutrients. Therefore, the nutrient content of vermicompost prepared from all substrates showed the highest values for all macro and micro plant nutrients. Thus, the vermicompost made from all materials could correct the plant nutrient imbalance and could be used for vermicompost preparation based on the accessibility of materials. Also utilizing the vermicompost for crop production and enhancing soil fertility.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Nutrient Content of Vermicompost Made from Different Substrates at Mechara Agricultural Research Center on Station, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Tadele Geremu AU - Habtamu Hailu AU - Alemayhu Diriba Y1 - 2020/10/30 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12 DO - 10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12 T2 - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JF - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology JO - Ecology and Evolutionary Biology SP - 125 EP - 130 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3762 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eeb.20200504.12 AB - The study was conducted at Mechara Agricultural Research Centre during 2016–2018 to evaluate nutrient content of vermicompost made from different substrates. The treatments were sorghum straw, maize straw, teff straw, haricot bean straw, grass straw and mixture of all straws. A red worm (Eisenia fetida) was selected to digest the substrates. The substrates was chopped and added to the worm bin volume calculated using spherical frustum formula 1/6πh (3a2+3b2+h2 in a ration 2.5:1 ration of cattle manure to crop residue in weight basis. Water was sprayed to maintain optimum moisture for worms as it needed. The vermi composting process was started by releasing 100 worms in to the substrates. Matured composite vermicompost samples were prepared and collected for laboratory analysis. The laboratory result showed that, the pH and EC values of all type of vermicompost are found in suitable range for survival of earthworms and also for plant growth. Data with regards to %OC, C: N ratio and CEC of vermicompost made from all material is excellent and promise for improvement of soil properties. Relatively the highest (4.26%) and lowest (3.04%) TN content was recorded from vermicompost made from grasses and haricot bean substrates respectively. The highest value of available P and K was also registered from vermicompost prepared from all materials. Even if the values of recorded exchangeable Ca, Mg, K and extractable micro nutrients were different, the vermicompost obtained from all substrates were rich in exchangeable cations and micro nutrients. Therefore, the nutrient content of vermicompost prepared from all substrates showed the highest values for all macro and micro plant nutrients. Thus, the vermicompost made from all materials could correct the plant nutrient imbalance and could be used for vermicompost preparation based on the accessibility of materials. Also utilizing the vermicompost for crop production and enhancing soil fertility. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -
Email: