In this paper a consistency of new very precise data on electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section with existing proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors data is investigated. First, the result is represented by a theoretically predicted dashed line for the total cross section obtained in the simultaneous analysis of the proton and neutron form factors data by the advanced nucleon electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model, and then, as the neutron data are always less precise from objective reasons than the proton data, the result is also represented by a theoretically predicted full line for the total cross section obtained in the analysis of only the proton form factors data in space-like and time-like regions by the advanced proton electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model. In both cases one finds disagreement between the electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section data and the corresponding form factors data, which is demonstrated by a disagreement of the dashed and full curves representing theoretically predicted electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross sections behaviors.
Published in | American Journal of Modern Physics (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11 |
Page(s) | 41-50 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nucleons, Vector Mesons, Electromagnetic Form Factors, Analyticity, Cross Sections
[1] | Adamuscin, C. Bartos, E. Dubnicka, S. Dubnickova, A.Z. (2016). Numerical Values of fF, fD, fS Coupling Constants in SU(3) Invariant Interaction Lagrangian of Vector-Meson Nonet with 1/2+ Octet Baryons. Phys. Rev. C, 93, 055208. |
[2] | Tanabashi, M. et al. (2018). (Particle Data Group) Review of Particle Physics. Phys. Rev. D, 98, 03000. |
[3] | Baldini, R. Paceti, S. Zalo, A. Zichichi, A. (2009). Unexpected Features of e+e−→ p¯ p and e+e−→ Λ¯Λ Cross Section Near Threshold. Eur. Phys. J. A, 39, 315. |
[4] | Jones, M. K. et al, (2000). GpE/GpM Ratio by Polarization Transfer in Polarized e p → e Polarized p. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1398. |
[5] | Gayou, O. et al, (2002). Measurement of GpE/GpM in Polarized-e p → e Polarized-p to Q**2 = 5.6-GeV**2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 092301. |
[6] | Punjabi, V. et al, (2005). Proton Elastic Form-Factor Ratios to Q**2 = 3.5-GeV**2 by Polarization Transfer. Phys. Rev. C, 71, 055202. |
[7] | Zhan, X. et al, (2011). High-Precision Measurement of the Proton Elastic Form Factor Ratio µpGE/GM at low Q2. Phys. Lett. B, 705, 59. |
[8] | Pucket A. J. R. et al, (2011). Final Analysis of Proton Form Factor Ratio Data at Q2= 4.0 4.8 and 5.6 GeV2. Phys. Rev. C, 85, 045203. |
[9] | Bernauer, J. (2010). (MAMI), Measurement of the Elastic Electron-Proton Cross-Section and Separation of the Electric and Magnetic Form Factors in the Q2 range from 0.004 to 1 (GeV/c)2. Ph.D. Thesis (Mainz: Johannes- Gutenberg-Univ). |
[10] | Janssens, T. et al, (1966). Proton Form Factors From Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering. Phys. Rev. 142, 922. American Journal of Modern Physics 2021; 10(3): 41-50 49 |
[11] | Berger, Ch. et al, (1971) Electromagnetic Form-Factors of the Proton at Squared Four Momentum Transfers Between 10-fm**-2 and 50 fm**-2. Phys. Lett. B, 35, 87. |
[12] | Bartel, W. et al, (1973). Measurement of Proton and Neutron Electromagnetic Form-Factors at Squared Four Momentum Transfers up to 3 (GeV/c)2. Nucl. Phys. B, 58, 429. |
[13] | Hoehler, G. et al, (1976). Analysis of Electromagnetic Nucleon Form-Factors. Nucl. Phys. B, 114, 505. |
[14] | Sill, A.F. et al, (1993). Measurements of elastic electron - proton scattering at large momentum transfer. Phys. Rev. D, 48, 29. |
[15] | Walker, R.C. et al, (1994). Measurements of the Proton Elastic Form-Factors for Q2= 1(GeV/c)2-3(GeV/c)2 at SLAC. Phys. Rev. D, 49, 5671. |
[16] | Andivakis, L. et al, (1994). Measurements of the Electric and Magnetic Form-Factors of the Proton From Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 8.83-GeV/c**2. Phys. Rev. D, 50, 5491. |
[17] | Ablikim, M. et al, (2015). Measurement of the Proton Form Factor by Studying e+e− → p¯ p. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 91, 112004. |
[18] | Lees, J. et al, (2013). Study of e+e−→ p¯ p Via Initial- State Radiation at BABAR. (BaBar Collaboration),Phys. Rev. D, 87, 092005. |
[19] | Bassompierre, G. et al, (1983). Electron Positron Pair Production in Anti-P P Annihilation at Rest and Related Determination of the Electromagnetic Form-Factor of the Proton in the Timelike Region. Nuovo. Cim. A, 73, 347. |
[20] | Delcourt, B. et al, (1979). Study of the Reaction e+e−→ p¯ p in the Total Energy Range 1925-MeV - 2180-MeV. Phys. Lett. B, 86, 395. |
[21] | Bisello, D. et al, (1983). A Measurement of e+e−→ p¯ p for 1975−MeV <√s < 2250−MeV. Nucl. Phys. B, 224, 379. |
[22] | Bardin, G. et al, (1994). Determination of the Electric and Magnetic Form-Factors of the Proton in the Timelike Region. (PS 170 Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, 411, 3. |
[23] | Armstrong, T.A. et al, (1993). Measurement of the Proton Electromagnetic Form-Factors in the Timelike Region at 9 GeV2 to 13 GeV2. (E760 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1212. |
[24] | Ambrogiani, M. et al, (1999) Measurements of the Magnetic Form-Factor of the Proton in the Timelike Region at Large Momentum Transfer. (E735 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D, 60, 032002. |
[25] | M. Ablikim et al, (2005). Measurement of the Cross Section for e+e−→ p¯ p at Center-of-Mass Energies From 2.0-GeV to 3.07-GeV. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B, 630, 14. |
[26] | B. Aubert et al, (2006). A Study of e+e− → p¯ p Using Initial State Radiation With BABAR. (BaBar Collaboration),Phys. Rev. D, 73, 012005. |
[27] | J. P. Lees et al, (2013). Measurement of the e+e−→ p¯ p Cross Section in the Energy Range From 3.0 to 6.5 GeV. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys.Rev. D, 88, 072009. |
[28] | Antonelli, A. et al, (1998). The First Measurement of the Neutron Electromagnetic Form-Factors in the Timelike Region. (FENICE Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, 517, 3. |
[29] | K. M. Hanson et al, (1973). Large Angle Quasielastic Electron-Deuteron Scattering. Phys. Rev. D, 8, 753. |
[30] | R. W. Berard et al, (1973). Elastic Electron Deuteron Scattering. Phys. Lett. 47, 355. |
[31] | S. Galster et al, (1971). Elastic Electron-Deuteron Scattering and the Electric Neutron Form Factor at Four- Momentum Transfers 5fm−2< q2< 14fm−2. Nucl. Phys. B, 32, 221. |
[32] | W. Bartel et al, (1972). Electromagnetic Form-Factors of the Neutron at Squared Four-Momentum Transfers of 1.0 and 1.5 (GeV/c)2. Phys. Lett. B, 39, 407. |
[33] | D. I. Glazier et al, (2005). Measurement of the Electric Form-Factor of the Neutron at Q**2 = 0.3-(GeV/c)**2 to 0.8-(GeV/c)**2. Eur. Phys. J. A, 24, 101. |
[34] | G. Warren et al, (2004). Measurement of the Electric Form-Factor of the Neutron at Q2= 0.5 and 1.0 GeV2/c2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 042301. |
[35] | J. Golak et al, (2001). Extraction of Electromagnetic Neutron Form Factors Through Inclusive and Exclusive Polarized Electron Scattering on a Polarized3He target. Phys. Rev. C, 63, 034006. |
[36] | S. Rock et al, (1982). Measurement of Elastic Electron - Neutron Cross-Sections Up to Q**2 = 10-(GeV/c)**2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1139. |
[37] | H. Anklin et al, (1998). Precise Measurements of the Neutron Magnetic Form-Factor. Phys. Lett. B, 428, 248. |
[38] | G. Kubon et al, (2002). Precise Neutron Magnetic Form- Factors. Phys. Lett. B, 524, 26. |
[39] | P. Markowitz et al, (1993). Measurement of the Magnetic Form Factor of the Neutron. Phys. Rev. C, 48, R5. |
[40] | A. Lung et al, (1993). Measurements of the Electric and Magnetic Form-Factors of the Neutron From Q**2 = 1.75-GeV/c**2 to 4-GeV/c**2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 718. 50 Anna Zuzana Dubnickova and Stanislav Dubnicka: Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements |
[41] | E. E. W. Bruins et al, (1995). Measurement of the Neutron Magnetic Form-Factor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 21. |
[42] | B. Anderson et al, (2007). Extraction of the Neutron Magnetic Form Factor From Quasielastic~ He 3(~e,e0) at Q2= 0,1 − 0,6(GeV/c)2. Phys. Rev. C, 75, 034003. |
[43] | B. Plaster et al, (2006). Measurements of the Neutron Electric to Magnetic Form-Factor Ratio G(En) / G(Mn) via the H-2(polarized-e, e-prime,polarized-n)H- 1 Reaction to Q**2 = 1.45-(GeV/c)**2. Phys. Rev. C, 73, 025205. |
[44] | S. Riordan et al, (2010). Measurements of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron up to Q2=3.4GeV2Using the Reaction3He → (~e,e0n)pp. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 262302. |
[45] | M.Ablikin et al., (2020). Measurement of Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors in e+e−→ p¯ p in the Energy Region 2.00 - 3.08 GeV. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 042001. |
[46] | M. Ablikin et al., (2019). Study of the Process e+e−→ p¯ p via Initial State Radiation at BESIII. Phys. Rev. D, 99, 092002. |
APA Style
Anna Zuzana Dubnickova, Stanislav Dubnicka. (2021). Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements. American Journal of Modern Physics, 10(3), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11
ACS Style
Anna Zuzana Dubnickova; Stanislav Dubnicka. Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements. Am. J. Mod. Phys. 2021, 10(3), 41-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11
AMA Style
Anna Zuzana Dubnickova, Stanislav Dubnicka. Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements. Am J Mod Phys. 2021;10(3):41-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11, author = {Anna Zuzana Dubnickova and Stanislav Dubnicka}, title = {Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements}, journal = {American Journal of Modern Physics}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {41-50}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.20211003.11}, abstract = {In this paper a consistency of new very precise data on electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section with existing proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors data is investigated. First, the result is represented by a theoretically predicted dashed line for the total cross section obtained in the simultaneous analysis of the proton and neutron form factors data by the advanced nucleon electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model, and then, as the neutron data are always less precise from objective reasons than the proton data, the result is also represented by a theoretically predicted full line for the total cross section obtained in the analysis of only the proton form factors data in space-like and time-like regions by the advanced proton electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model. In both cases one finds disagreement between the electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section data and the corresponding form factors data, which is demonstrated by a disagreement of the dashed and full curves representing theoretically predicted electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross sections behaviors.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors Data Are in Disagreement with New Electron-Positron Annihilation into Proton-Antiproton Pair Total Cross Section Measurements AU - Anna Zuzana Dubnickova AU - Stanislav Dubnicka Y1 - 2021/05/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11 T2 - American Journal of Modern Physics JF - American Journal of Modern Physics JO - American Journal of Modern Physics SP - 41 EP - 50 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-8891 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmp.20211003.11 AB - In this paper a consistency of new very precise data on electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section with existing proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors data is investigated. First, the result is represented by a theoretically predicted dashed line for the total cross section obtained in the simultaneous analysis of the proton and neutron form factors data by the advanced nucleon electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model, and then, as the neutron data are always less precise from objective reasons than the proton data, the result is also represented by a theoretically predicted full line for the total cross section obtained in the analysis of only the proton form factors data in space-like and time-like regions by the advanced proton electromagnetic structure Unitary and Analytic model. In both cases one finds disagreement between the electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross section data and the corresponding form factors data, which is demonstrated by a disagreement of the dashed and full curves representing theoretically predicted electron-positron annihilation into proton-antiproton pair total cross sections behaviors. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -